Unbundling the Bundle: Texas’s New Anti-Tying Law in Home Insurance

Introduction

In the vast landscape of Texas, where sprawling ranches meet bustling urban centers, homeownership comes with its unique set of challenges and protections. The Lone Star State is no stranger to extreme weather, from hurricanes along the Gulf Coast to hailstorms in the Panhandle, making home insurance not just a luxury but a necessity for many. Yet, amidst the standard policies and premiums, there lies a web of regulations that govern how insurers operate. One such provision, often overlooked by the average homeowner, is the recently enacted Senate Bill 213 (SB 213), which prohibits the mandatory tying of residential property insurance—commonly known as home insurance—with personal automobile insurance. This law, effective as of September 1, 2025, represents a subtle but significant shift in consumer protections, aiming to foster greater choice and competition in the insurance market.

Origins and Context

To understand why SB 213 qualifies as an obscure home insurance law, it’s essential to delve into its origins and context. Texas’s insurance regulations are overseen by the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI), which enforces a comprehensive framework under the Texas Insurance Code. Home insurance in Texas covers perils like fire, theft, and certain weather events, but exclusions for floods and earthquakes are common, requiring separate policies. Historically, insurers have offered discounts for bundling home and auto policies, a practice that can save consumers money but sometimes crosses into coercive territory. Before SB 213, some companies made the renewal or issuance of one policy contingent on purchasing the other, effectively forcing customers into bundles. This “tying” practice, while not rampant, was a point of contention, particularly in a state where auto insurance is mandatory for drivers, and home insurance is often required by mortgage lenders.

The Legislative Process

The bill emerged during the 89th Regular Session of the Texas Legislature in 2025, sponsored by Senator Robert Nichols. It was introduced to address consumer complaints about limited options and potential anti-competitive behavior in the insurance industry. The legislative process saw it pass through committees, with a committee substitute version refining its language. On June 20, 2025, it cleared both houses and was signed into law, marking a win for consumer advocates who argued that mandatory bundling reduced market competition and disadvantaged those who preferred shopping around for the best rates. The TDI issued Commissioner’s Bulletin B-0012-25 in August 2025 to alert insurers of the impending changes, emphasizing compliance to avoid penalties.

Key Provisions

At its core, SB 213 amends Chapter 551 of the Texas Insurance Code by adding Subchapter F, titled “Contingency of Residential Property and Personal Automobile Policies.” The law defines residential property insurance and personal automobile insurance by referencing Section 38.002 of the Code, which broadly encompasses homeowners, renters, and dwelling policies for the former, and standard auto coverage for the latter. The key prohibition is straightforward: insurers cannot make the issuance, delivery, or renewal of a home insurance policy contingent on buying auto insurance from the same insurer, an affiliated company, or agent—and vice versa. Violating this is classified as an unfair method of competition or a deceptive act under Chapter 541, which opens the door to fines, cease-and-desist orders, and even license revocation for repeat offenders.

Exemptions and Scope

However, the law isn’t absolute; it includes exemptions to maintain flexibility in high-risk areas. Windstorm and hail insurance policies, often provided through the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA) in coastal regions, are exempt. Similarly, flood insurance, typically underwritten by the National Flood Insurance Program, and personal umbrella policies—which offer excess liability coverage—are not subject to the anti-tying rule. These carve-outs recognize that certain specialized coverages operate under different market dynamics, where bundling might not pose the same consumer harm.

Why Is This Law Obscure?

Why is this law obscure? For starters, it’s brand new, having taken effect just months ago on September 1, 2025. Many homeowners remain unaware of it, as insurance disclosures and marketing materials are still catching up. Unlike more prominent regulations, such as those mandating prompt claim payments under Chapter 542 or the Homeowners Insurance Bill of Rights, SB 213 doesn’t directly impact day-to-day claims or premiums—it’s more about structural market fairness. The Bill of Rights, for instance, includes well-known protections like the right to a written explanation for policy changes or prohibitions on denying coverage solely based on credit scores. In contrast, anti-tying rules fly under the radar, affecting negotiations rather than visible policy terms.

Implications for Texas Homeowners

The implications for Texas homeowners are multifaceted. On the positive side, the law empowers consumers to mix and match policies, potentially leading to better deals. For example, a family in Houston might secure affordable home insurance from one provider specializing in hurricane-prone areas while getting auto coverage from another with superior customer service ratings. This could spur competition, encouraging insurers to improve standalone products rather than relying on bundle discounts to retain customers. Advocates argue it levels the playing field for smaller insurers who might not offer both lines of coverage, fostering innovation and possibly lower rates overall.

Potential Drawbacks

Yet, there are potential drawbacks. Bundling often provides genuine savings—up to 25% in some cases—through multi-policy discounts. Without mandatory tying, these incentives remain voluntary, but critics worry that insurers might phase out deep discounts to offset lost revenue from unbundled policies. In a state grappling with rising insurance costs due to frequent natural disasters, this could exacerbate affordability issues. Texas already has some of the highest home insurance premiums in the nation, averaging over $2,500 annually, driven by claims from events like Winter Storm Uri in 2021 and Hurricane Beryl in 2024. If unbundling leads to higher standalone rates, lower-income households might feel the pinch.

Real-World Examples and Enforcement

Consider a hypothetical scenario: A retiree in Austin renews their home policy only to be told they must also switch their auto insurance to the same carrier for continuation. Pre-SB 213, this might have been enforceable; now, it’s illegal. If the homeowner complains to TDI, the insurer could face investigation. Real-world examples are emerging, with early reports from consumer forums indicating fewer forced bundles in post-effective date renewals. However, enforcement relies on awareness—homeowners must know their rights to invoke them.

Broader Context in Texas Insurance Protections

This law fits into a broader tapestry of Texas’s consumer protections. Related provisions in the Homeowners Insurance Bill of Rights prohibit premium hikes based on inquiries alone or claims from natural causes beyond the policyholder’s control. For instance, insurers can’t raise rates for weather-related claims if they’re not excessive (typically more than three in three years), and they must notify of increases over 10% at least 30 days in advance. SB 213 complements these by tackling upstream practices that influence policy availability.

Future Outlook

Looking ahead, the long-term effects of SB 213 will depend on market adaptation. Insurers might respond by enhancing value-added services, like smart home discounts or telematics for auto, to attract voluntary bundlers. Regulators at TDI will monitor compliance, potentially issuing further guidance if loopholes emerge—such as indirect incentives that border on coercion. For homeowners, education is key; resources like TDI’s website or consumer advocacy groups can help navigate these changes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Texas’s anti-tying law under SB 213 may not grab headlines like major disaster reforms, but its subtlety belies its importance. By dismantling mandatory bundles, it promotes a freer market, protecting consumers from undue pressure while preserving options in a state prone to unpredictable risks. As Texas continues to grow, with over 7 million owner-occupied homes, such obscure laws ensure that insurance remains a tool for security, not a trap. Homeowners would do well to review their policies come renewal time—freedom of choice is now enshrined in law.

Call us 800-875-4711